Alive365
Spiritual Appearance vs. Spiritual Substance
Leave a Comment
Partially due to the rise of the internet, our 3rd millennial lifestyles often lead us towards selfish, self-image spirituality. The emphasis isn’t on who we are on the inside, but who we present ourselves to be on the outside. We are judged by the content of blogs, MySpace and Facebook pages, personal websites, podcasts, and YouTube videos.
Unfortunately, all of these can be edited. I say “unfortunately” because in the midst of editing photos, blogs, videos, and the like, we are leaving part of ourselves behind. The more we edit, the easier it is to overlook the ugly parts of our lives. Whether it’s a stranger or a best friend that visits our website, they only see the best of us — not the worst. Whether we realize it or not, we are slowly becoming like spiritual Pharisees.
2 Timothy 3:5 has been deeply stirring for me. Speaking of the end times, Paul writes, “They’ll make a show of religion, but behind the scenes, they are animals.” Yikes. In many ways, many of us can relate.
We can have an appearance of godliness, yet deny its power. We can appear put together online, yet behave in a contrary way offline. A good show, whether at church or online, does not equal spiritual success.
It is somewhat unrealistic to suppose that we won’t put our “best foot forward” in a public arena. I dare say that we should still brush our teeth, check our spelling, and mind our manners. It definitely matter how others perceive us.
However, as we get better at marketing ourselves, it would be a death sentence to forget what is behind the scenes. One our greatest challenges is to confront the unseen parts of our life. Behind the scenes — when the camera is no longer rolling, when there is no more blogging to be done — what is left?
Tags: appearance, blogging, Leadership, spirituality, substance
There’s soft rock in heaven?
Leave a Comment
Whether it’s verbalized or not, a church’s music style communicates doctrine — or at the very least, it communicates values. That’s not something that we often think about. Unfortunately, we are usually more concerned with the sound than the substance, and we don’t stop to contemplate the greater implications of our style choices.
What does style communicate? For the hymn-singing church, it may be that “Church tradition is inherently valuable.” For the blended church, it may be that “Everyone should get along.” For the contemporary church, “Sunday morning ain’t so bad.” For the modern church, “Newer is better.” And for the emerging church, “There is more to worship than video screens.”
There are tremendous truths in those statements. However, once we establish what we are communicating, we then need to ask ourselves, “Is this what we want to be communicating? What are we saying about the Kingdom?”
Most often, we’ll find that we need say more. For the soft rock church, that may mean trying a new style of music. After all, there will be all kinds of voices in heaven. For the traditional church, that may mean incorporating some gospel songs or contemporary hymns — to communicate that God continues to speak through the ages. Or a blended church could cancel the music and read the Psalms for 20 minutes, emphasizing that worship goes beyond musical preferences.
While serving at Uptown Baptist Church in Chicago, I realized how much musical styles communicate. The church is full of ethnic and economic diversity, and the musical styles are also quite diverse — including traditional, African, contemporary, reggae, and gospel. As far as style goes, nothing was off limits.
At UBC, the different styles communicated a message about heaven: That every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. The congregation not only looked different, but we sounded different and sang different. Even a first-time visitor would have heard that our vision of heaven is a bit different than the church in a nearby suburb.
Now for your turn. What do the styles in your church communicate?
